I submit myself to the personal Subjektivisismus.
The Commuter blog in itself is somewhat disrespectful. I can understand their resentment against the largest free daily. I read the NZZ.
The authorization of the commuter blog is legitimate to turn to really populist mass leaves, such as "dog Basil underaged readers Watch blog." The Pendlerblog complains rightly also know that 20 minutes should offer him a look-subscription so they could escape from their focus. Rather than tune the bittersweet lament, It would be good demand, and a subscription of "Dog Watch Blog Basik under-age readers.
I personally find the commuter blog is a beautiful thing, beautiful and is modeled on the legendary Bildblog.de. But the occasional complacency of the reader and his babes barking dogs following I would like to rank as-a-secular-Intellektuieren. It must be! In the search for meaning and justification to provide the massage culture (20min) to excellent, build his own Legikremation. And prime be fun on a daily basis is a 20min, but pretty cool?
A Chäsblättli like 20min truly deserves such critics. The relationship 20min characterized by mistrust and readers is because readers are critical, since it is obviously a free toilet paper. Rather, one should focus on true opinion-paid leaves, rather than wasting energy on a format that is formulated automatically by the reader in itself critical.
(The comments of this post have been cleared of twenty-three vandals)
0 comments:
Post a Comment